Tuesday, April 22, 2025

To all interviewers: If you ask candidates whether they've been terminated at anytime in their working history, what were some "winning" answers, or at least answers that kept them in the running of the hiring process?

 

To all interviewers: If you ask candidates whether they've been terminated at anytime in their working history, what were some "winning" answers, or at least answers that kept them in the running of the hiring process?

I have a feeling that a lot of yes-answers would automatically disqualify them from the hiring process, but what exceptions can you share? If you've hired those who have been terminated at other jobs, how did they explain the circumstances leading to their termination? What are some "winning" answers to "have you been terminated in any previous jobs?"

 

 

all 41 comments

[–]the_elephant_sack 8 points  

I agree with this. Also, don’t trash your previous employer. “They were a bunch of jerks“ is not a winning answer. Owning the situation and talking about what you learned would be better than other options. Even if it was just cost cutting, show that you have reflected on it and learned something. “The company was cutting costs and looking back, they eliminated the people they thought were the least crucial to the company’s mission. I learned from that experience that just being an average employee is fine in good times but not in times of economic issues. It taught me to work harder and make myself a more important part of the team.”

[–]Ok-Double-7982 1 point  

This answer is the best answer.

[–]vett929 10 points  

Lie. Never say you get fired. At least in the US the job is not allowed to tell any new employer any more then “candidate worked here from date a- date b in this role “

[–]Generally_tolerable 2 points  

Why do people keep insisting this is true?

[–]GirthyOwls 0 points  

That’s not true, a company in the US is able to tell another company exactly why someone was fired.

[–]vett929 5 points  

Don’t let your HR department know you are doing that

[–]GirthyOwls -1 points  

I’m not saying I’m doing it. I am correcting your statement as there are no laws prohibiting an employer from revealing more than basic dates of employment. Many employers have internal policies that specify what they will share in reference checks but your statement that in the US employers cannot share more than basic dates of employment is wrong.

[–]marenicolor 8 points  

You are correct in that there is no law in the US. But employers are behooved to only share dates worked and whether the candidate is eligible for rehire to protect the company from lawsuits.

[–]GirthyOwls 3 points  

Agreed. Even if the lawsuit is frivolous due to for example, an employer sharing only factual information, just having to respond or engage to lawsuits can be really costly. That’s why most companies provide the bare minimum so they can avoid it at all.

[–][deleted] 1 point  

Obviously Reddit is US-Centric but still, let's just be sure we're not misrepresenting the actual rules and laws.

In the UK for instance, the employer does have the right to say anything about it's employees, as long as it's true and fair. "Truth" in this context is objective - and so companies would rather just give the basic info as they don't want to open themselves up to a lawsuit from a former employee claiming to have suffered as a result of the company giving their "subjective opinion".

But... things like your employment being terminated on grounds of gross misconduct is objective (not the opinion of whether it was gross misconduct, but that your employment was terminated).

[–]meanderingwolf -3 points  

Just FYI: I didn’t get to the level I did by being naive. I have had many years of experience and interviewed more narcissists and sociopaths than I care to think about. As a result, I developed other means I used to validate their responses, to this and other questions. Sorry to bust your bubble, but it didn’t happen like you imagined.

[–]Sad_Energy_ 4 points  

You described it very pass/fail in your initial comment.

I am a person who'd be nervous getting asked this question, even though I haven't even been fired anywhere yet.

[–]meanderingwolf -4 points  

Then your nervousness is unwarranted and it would be helpful for you to figure out why, and address it. Life is too short not to.

[–]hitch00 1 point  

So you see a genuine piece of disconfirming evidence, showing that your “method” actually returns false positives—people who are uncomfortable but not lying—and your response is, “well you must have something wrong with you, get help.”?

Absolutely elite HR mentality.

[–]meanderingwolf 1 point  

Not true!

[–]Sad_Energy_ 1 point  

Well, clarify then, please. Because it is exactly what you wrote.

[–]meanderingwolf 1 point  

No, I didn’t. I suggested that the individual would benefit from discovering the root cause of their nervousness and address it, further stating that they would benefit from doing so.

Nervousness was never a disqualifying factor in what I originally said. That was easy to identify and confirm with the individual. There were no negative consequences.

The people that were lying, most with narcissistic or sociopathic tendencies, were very well practiced and hard to detect. But, there are subtle cues that are hard for them to hide.

[–]Sad_Energy_ 1 point  

You literally distinguished good and bad candidates by getting relaxed or getting nervous.

It is not ALL, you used to identify them, but it is the first characteristic you mention of each type of candidate.

You could see the good candidates, that ones that had learned and grown from their experience, relax

Poor candidates would get nervous

[–]ohhhaley 2 points  

How would you advise someone who was a victim of sexual harassment and retaliatory termination answer that question?

[–]Significant-Luck9987[🍰] 1 point  

You went back and verified every interviewee's claims about prior terminations with their previous employers and found you had 100% precision in judging their honesty? Very impressive

[–]meanderingwolf 1 point  

I didn’t say or claim that, you did. There probably were a few that got the best of me over the many years. But, when you did what I did for that many years, you get pretty good at telling when people are acting.

[–]Significant-Luck9987[🍰] 1 point  

Yeah I was keenly aware that you have no basis to evaluate your ability to accurately judge a candidate's honesty at any speed. Could instantly tell!

[–]Sad_Energy_ 1 point  

Yeah, they are just built diff.

Court houses have tried signing them for years.

[–]meanderingwolf 1 point  

Whatever, you understand perfectly well what I meant.

[–][deleted]  

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point  

Exactly. The answer is a resounding “nope”

[–]UsedNegotiation8227 0 points  

Why would anyone ever answer yes to that?

No comments:

Post a Comment