Friday, March 25, 2022

As a parody singer-songwriter, I won't be like Weird Al in that while he secures permission from all artists whose songs he parodies, I will not. I heard long ago that I didn't need to secure those permissions, but can someone back that up with an official source?

 

all 5 comments

[–]gnopgnip 10 points  

Parody can be fair use, but fair use is based on a four factor test where no single factor is determinative. See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose for the landmark parody case

[–]pitathegreat 7 points  

Weird Al doesn’t actually need permission - he’s just being polite. Paul McCartney refused permission, and Weird Al simply left it off of the album as a courtesy. He still performs it live.

[–][deleted] 3 points  

Weird Al doesn’t actually need permission

He'd win an infringement lawsuit, surely, but fair use is a defense you have to raise in a trial; whereas a written permission note can be used to dismiss a lawsuit before a trial.

[–]ThadisJones 4 points  

what if those artists are now passed away

Rights are considered an asset and become part of the artist's estate. Weird Al would ask permission from whomever inherited them.

[–]smarterthanyoda 3 points  

Here is a page from the government Copyright Office that explains fair use. It includes a link to the actual law.

This article is not a government source but goes into more detail. It specifically mentions parody, which is what you’re probably looking for.

No comments:

Post a Comment